“Between 1939 and 1945 180.000 psychiatric patients were killed in Nazi-Germany.”
This is published today:
"FOCUS: In this commemoration at the congress of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Nervenheilkunde (German Association of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Neurology) you are about to offer an apology for the crimes committed by psychiatry during the period of the National Socialism. Why hasn’t this long been done?"But this is the astonishing and shocking reality in German psychiatry today:
from: http://www.meinungsverbrechen.de/?tag=dgppn
Germany
2012: World
Congress of Psychiatric Genetics
Peter
Falkai, MD, Professor of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychiatry
and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Göttingen, President DGPPN
Whenever there is a violation against human rights anywhere in the world, you can be dead certain that this will be published in Germany.
„Offensichtlich ist, dass es Rechtsstaatlichkeit für psychisch Kranke nicht gibt und sich niemand dem grundgesetzlichen Auftrag für diese Mitbürger verpflichtet fühlt. " (see the German text at the end of this page)
In contrast, mentally ill patients seem to be of absolutely no interest in Germany - for nobody.
It can be assumed that in some cases their rights are expired as soon as they are in psychiatric care and their rights suddenly cease to be in force when the patients are institutionalised.
To keep a career spotless seems to be much more important for legal authorities in Germany than following basic laws in the interest of helpless in-patients.
“Psychiatry’s bible, the DSM, is doing more harm than good”
Berthold
Brecht once said: “There are many ways to kill a human
being.”
One of the ways, pointed out by Brecht, is to force him to commit suicide.
“Most
psychiatric drugs can cause withdrawal reactions, sometimes including
life-threatening emotional and physical withdrawal problems. In short, it is not
only dangerous to start taking psychiatric drugs, it can also be dangerous to
stop them. Withdrawal from psychiatric drugs should be done carefully under
experienced clinical supervision. Methods for safely withdrawing from
psychiatric drugs are discussed in Dr. Breggin's books, Brain-Disabling
Treatments in Psychiatry: Drugs, Electroshock and the Psychopharmaceutical
Complex (New York: Springer Publishing Company, 2008) and Medication
Madness: The Role of Psychiatric Drugs in Cases of Violence, Suicide and Crime (New
York: St. Martin's Press, 2008).”
The comment of a reader from England on these pages:
"the way you are working is correct but the other side leaves no stone unturned to show you how much power they have and even their lack of compassionate and dempcratic thinking doesn't appear to embarrass them. Truly horrible people."
This
is a translation out of a text,
a patient of psychiatry with a lot of experience posted in November 2009:
“For
a long time I’ve been thinking about the experiences I made at the time I
needed psychiatric care and what I experienced wasn’t only negative. In fact I
had the impression that most of the people I met there really wanted to help me
overcome my problems.
Nevertheless
I recognized problems that made me feel quite nauseated and in my opinion a high
percentage of care in mental hospitals isn’t necessarily performed in the real
interests of the patients due to other considerations.
Patients
are often taken into care
· to
protect the public from being confronted with the problems of mental
difficulties.
· To
protect the public from any danger related to people who are mentally unstable.
· To
get the mentally ill back into employment as soon as possible, disregarding
possible complications. In some cases highly qualified workers are forced to
accept employment that is well below their qualifications, often with arguments
that bear no relation to the problem.
· To
keep the costs caused by mental disorders as low as possible for the general
public. How these costs are minimized is immaterial and the experts often
turn to the use of medication as means of reducing symptoms and tranquillizing
the patients.
In
my opinion the present goal of psychiatry isn’t to cure the patient but is
aimed at merely reducing the symptoms to avoid social and economic
costs to society as a whole. It doesn’t matter to experts working in mental
care whether the patient puts on weight or loses their teeth, the primary
goal is that the patient is tranquillised and doesn’t cause any bother. The
patient can then vegetate until time takes its toll.
Suicide
is never an accident but should be seen as a possibility of solving problems.
It’s only an accident when it is seen as such and when the statistics state
that 15% of schizophrenic patients die at some time from suicide then that is a
lot of people.
They
only call it an accident when suicide is talked about. When people hear or read
about it, there is a concerned silentness. Not more. But it happens, really
often.
We
patients are just objects which cause costs. I’m absolutely convinced that the
purpose of mental health care isn’t to cure the patients but to reduce these
costs. And the privatisation of hospitals in Lower Saxony fully support my
conviction.
Additionally
it shouldn’t be forgotten that psychiatrists, psychologists and
psychotherapists all want a piece of the cake, not to mention the huge
pharmaceutical industry that wants its share as well.
My
100% conclusion is that, the care of patients isn’t the primary goal of
psychiatry.”
The
situation in a psychiatric hospital in Germany today:
42.286 patients died in german psychiatric clinics between 1991 and 2003, 78 of them were children.
This was/is the last statisic that can be found, nothing newer is published any more. There will be reasons.
Psychiatric treatment in Germany is strongly under the influence of a society,
There is a very strong relationship
between them and the the
pharma-industry, too, see
Systematically expert
witnesses, public persecutors and even the state Ministry of Justice all did
and still do their best to cover up the circumstances which led to the death of
my son in a clinic in Rostock, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, a federal state which
lies in the north of Germany.
My son wasn’t the only
patient to die at the same clinic..
Whenever
there is a violation of human rights anywhere in the world you can be sure that
a story about it will be published by the German media, but strangely,
human-rights violations affecting mentally ill patients in Germany don’t
appear to arouse much interest either from German politicians or any branches of
the media in this country.
My son, Mario Hagemeister, died as a private patient in the “care” of Dr.
Sabine C. Herpertz Dept. of General Psychiatry University of Heidelberg.
What happened there in Rostock in 2005 is much more than just a fatal error, even more than willful breaches of duty:
This is, how they present themselves on the internet in these days:
"we can do everything, except science"
"wir
können alles, außer wissenschaft"
At the same time in Rostock, their patients:
On March 2nd, 2004 Thomas J. set fire to himself in Rostock.
On January 8th, 2006 Mario Hagemeister jumped from the top of the
Hotel Neptun
In January 2008 Roman H. in Rostock hung himself. As in the case of Mario he was also a private patient of Prof. Herpertz.
On May 25th, 2008 Reinhard Z. jumped from a church in Rostock. He was a private patient, too.
They were all patients of this pychiatric clinic in Rostock.
As you see, my son is not the only in-patient who died under the care of Dr. Sabine Herpertz, professor in psychiatry, chair in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, and director of the department of General Psychiatry at the University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, DGPPN, Germany.
In the clinic in Rostock for mental health Prof. Dr. Sabine Herpertz was responsible for my son.
He
was her private patient there.
Prof. Dr. Sabine C. Herpertz is now head of the General Psychiatry University of Heidelberg.
All this happened in 2005/06 in
the Department
of the General Psychiatry at the University of Rostock where she was
responsible before she went to Heidelberg.
Her
former senior doctor, Dr.
Habermeyer, DGPPN, also left Rostock, he moved to
Zurich, Switzerland.
If
you have a close look at the medical record of my son, published on the internet,
you will find a lot of manipulations in the documents.
Prof. Dr. Herpertz and the first two expert witnesses appointed by the public persecuters in Rostock are very good mates with many books published together and have also many other very close relationships with the clinic and the former responsible senior consultant, Prof. Dr. Sabine Herpertz.
The original text (abstract on the right side) can be found by opening this link:
In
this picture you can see
Prof. Dr. Herpertz and Prof Dr. Fryberger
together in a conference of their
society, the DGPPN in Berlin
in
November. The second fellow member and
expert witness in this case, Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c.
Wolfersdorf, DGPPN, was also
there.
Prof Dr. Freyberger, DGPPN, also declared in his written report about this case that he had no financial relationship to a drugmaker, see "footnotes":
http://www.aerztepfusch-psychiatrie.de/index.php?seite=psychiatrische_gutachten
"Dr. Freyberger has received support from the German Research Foundation and the Social Ministry of the Federal State of Mecklenburg-West Pomerania of Germany; he has received speaking honoraria from AstraZeneca, Lilly, Novartis and travel funds from Janssen-Cilag" and his “declaration “ with his own words.
http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/163/11/1986:
“Received Dec. 10, 2004; revisions received May 3 and June 20, 2005; accepted Aug. 18, 2005. From the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy and the Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Greifswald; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn; and the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Homburg, Germany. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Grabe, Department of Psychiatry, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University of Greifswald, Klinikum der Hansestadt Stralsund, Rostocker Chaussee 70, 18437 Stralsund, Germany; grabeh@uni-greifswald.de (e-mail).Funded in part by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and in part by grants from the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF grant no. 01ZZ96030), the Ministry for Education, Research, and Cultural Affairs, and the Ministry for Social Affairs of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania.Dr. Grabe has received support from the German Research Foundation; he has received speaking honoraria from Eisai, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and Wyeth and travel funds from Janssen-Cilag. Dr. Ruhrmann has received speaking honoraria from Astra Zeneca and travel funds from Janssen-Cilag. Dr. Freyberger has received support from the German Research Foundation and the Social Ministry of the Federal State of Mecklenburg-West Pomerania of Germany; he has received speaking honoraria from AstraZeneca, Lilly, Novartis and travel funds from Janssen-Cilag. Dr. Klosterkötter has received support from the European Union, German Research Foundation, Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany; he has received speaking honoraria and travel funds from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Eli Lilly. Dr. Falkai has received support from the German Research Foundation and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research; he has received speaking honoraria from AstraZeneca, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, Lundbeck, Organon, and Pfizer. Dr. John has received support from the European Union, the Federal Ministry of Education and Research Germany, and the Social Ministry of the Federal State of Mecklenburg-West Pomerania of Germany. Dr. Maier has received project funding from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, the European Union, Adir, AstraZeneca, Cyberonics, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, Lundbeck, and Pfizer. Dr. Wagner has received research support from the German Research Foundation and speaking honoraria from Sanofi-Aventis. Drs. Ettelt, Buhtz, Hochrein, Schulze-Rauschenbach, Meyer, Kraft, Reck, and Pukrop report no competing interests.“
Two more examples of
evidence also for obvious prejudice
are:
www.gesellschaft-nervenheilkunde-mv.de/vorstand.html and Sozialpsychiatrie Mecklenburg Vorpommern
DGPPN
Kongress 2005, this link presents the complete program: They are all here,
leading members of the DGPPN,
Prof. Dr. Herpertz,
Dr.
Habermeyer, 
Prof. Dr.
Freyberger
Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Wolfersdorf
Prof. Dr.
Leygraf.
All this is no reason for the
public prosecuters in Rostock to doubt these proved and very close relationships
at all. They all work together and they do their best to cover up and to hide
what had really happened.
These professors are leading
members of the DGPPN, a
society of psychiatrists who seem to have very close relationships not only to
drugmakers.
The first of the following pictures
shows my son two weeks before he became a patient in the clinic in Rostock.
Nobody outside was even informed.
The day after his death, Prof. Dr. Herpertz in Rostock, responsible for her private patient, did not even know that had been dead already for a day.
All this is proved, even by a witness under oath.
More statements of other witnesses are published on the first side of my German documentation.
These witnesses find absolutely no attention by the German authorities to this very day. They carry on as if they don`t exist. They seemingly do their best not to reveal any faults, they even do their best to cover them up.
Even the medical record shows that he was in a terrible state of mind in the morning of the day they let him go on his own.
There you find the words: “He
seemed to be confused, helpless and perplexed”
Until the day before he had been under compulsory admission since the beginning of his treatment and this was not terminated.
It was a Saturday morning, Prof. Dr. Sabine Herpertz was on holiday, like many others, too, and nobody else was there to examine him and they just let him go.
It was a long weekend !
Shortly
after they had let him out for the first time after nearly three months, in this
completely helpless condition,
he
was sexually abused by an old man.
From that day on he did not want to
live any more.
During these days the head doctor, Prof. Dr. Sabine Herpertz, had many appointments, far away from the clinic in Rostock.
She was simply not there. She was far away, busy, planning and preparing her personal career in the south of Germany.
Her private patient was left behind in Rostock, neglected and fixated witout legal permission.
16. - 17.9.05 2005. meeting in Schloss Saarbrücken with speeches on september 16th, for that very day a signature of the head doctor can be found in the documents pretending that a personal treatment had happened in Rostock the same time she was in reality far away in Saarbrücken.
In her "documentation of her conversations with her private patient" you find this remark, surely this is, no way, the documentation of a conversation with a private patient:
In fact, on this day she is in Saarbrücken, about 850 kilometres away from Rostock and her private patient. Even so, from this distance, she can "elicit" a diagnosis and even sign to be present for a treatment for 30 minutes in Rostock at the same time.
24. - 28. 9.05 General meeting of the Görres-Gesellschaft
28.9. - 3.10.05 head doctor on holiday, and after that
5.- 8.10.2005 in München, Heidelberg und Bremen.
13. - 15.10.05 in Luxemburg
A few days after being abused, the patient said he wanted to jump from a high building with the intention not to feel anything anymore.
13.10. „möchte sich am liebsten von einem Hochhaus stürzen und nichts mehr merken“
Instead of psychotherapy and understanding treatment after that horrible experience, he was fixated on arms, legs and body (see picture two) for five days. During this time the head doctor was first on holiday and then on tour through the south of Germany.
They left him alone in a
room for five days without permission from a
judge, normally mandated by German law.
The third picture shows him two weeks before he died. It was taken in a Greek restaurant in Rostock.
You can see that he was in a completely neglected state
at that time.
He
said “Nice
that you came, although you are not real” to me, his
father, and to our doctor from our hometown, who was also there.
Picture number three was taken at that time.
Mario
lived completely in a fantasy world similar to the film “Matrix” that was very popular in
those days.
Two
weeks later, he jumped like
Neo in the film Matrix from an eighteen story high hotel at the East Sea, Hotel
Neptun.
Another video also had an enormous influence on him: Taliban Bodies - Special Edition
In
the morning of that day, January 8th 2006,
they had let him go out on his own,
alone,
again nobody outside was informed.
Four days before his death, as can be seen in his medical record, it was difficult for him to make out what was real and what was not !
The
night before his death he had spoken for a
long time on the telephone with two people, one
of them was a doctor herself.
Both of them testified later that Mario was completely psycotic and very suicidal that night.
http://www.todinrostock.de/julia.jpg and http://www.todinrostock.de/eid.pdf
In his imagination and under the influence of the given medication, he saw himself surrounded by aliens.
"The individual versus DIE DA OBEN" (THOSE UP THERE) These drawings were made by the patient on one of these days inside the clinic. The signs around the heads are supposed to be alien language!
Both of
these people were under the impression that he was in
the closed section
of the hospital and being well looked after, therefore in a safe situation.
It is a fact that: He was twice encouraged to leave the clinic all on his own.
This placed him in a completely helpless condition.
They left him alone in a very unstable and absolutely confused state of mind whilst under the influence of very strong medication.
The witnesses and the medical record of my son, document this fact clearly and without doubt.
The first time they let him out, it ended in disaster, he was abused by a sexual predator who had found him in the street in a confused state shortly after he had left the hospital.
After
which he was readmitted and was kept in restraints. Not even his parents
were kept informed of the situation.
Even deliquents receive a better treatment in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania.
Not even a treatment that is supplied for delinquents and criminals, was put into practice for this patient. They sent him out, alone into his death, one of the "expert wittnesses" said later that this is done in Germany today because of financial reasons.
Just imagine: He left the closed section of the clinic. Minutes later he sat in a park in the rain on a bench, all alone not knowing what to do and where to go, due to the influence of the drugs he had been administered.
That
is how he fell into the hands of the man who abused him.
The second time in January 2006, knowing what had happened the first time, the doctors responsible for their patient, let him go again in a similar helpless condition. This time he had absolutely no chance to survive.
Did they take this
risk knowingly?
On
January 9th 2006, 
Dr.
Kumbier, an assistant doctor, (not his doctor) not at all responsible for
the private patient, writes a
unique document.
In this he describes, (written the day after his death, not the day of his death) that the patient was in excellent health and of sound mind.
He
states that the patient was safe to leave the
hospital.
Why does he state this post mortem and why him? He had nothing to do with the private patient of the professor so why would he fill out this notice and not the professor?
And another
strange thing in this document right at the end he writes: “ 5.1.05
one-to-one
conversation with Mrs. Prof. Herpertz (see report)”
It would appear these documents were produced in a hurry, it is unfortunate for them that in their rush to cover up their mistakes they made several mistakes:
For
a start, he dated the document "January 2005", surely he meant
the year 2006.
He also did not take into account that the document he refers to in this report, that of his senior consultant , was actually written on the 10th. (How is it possible to refer to a document written in the future!)
She wrote this report the following day, on the 10th!
The document also refers to the week January 3rd-6th - a week with only four days, strange too.!
In the case record it also states that Dr. Kumbier had met this patient for the first time on January 4th or 5th !
These
are just some of the many examples of how they tried to manipulate the clinical
record of this patient.
“It
is currently impossible to distinguish between patients with depression who will
make a suicide attempt and those who will not.
Prevention, therefore, must be based on the assumption that any patient with
more than mild symptoms of depression is at risk of suicide, and can only be
effective if it is applicable to all patients with moderate to severe depression.
A treatment strategy that differentiated between regressive and progressive
therapeutic measures was developed for patients admitted to a psychiatric
hospital. Regressive, as opposed to progressive, treatment meant that the
patient was temporarily relieved of virtually all responsibilities for self and
others. Progressive measures were strictly avoided for all patients with
symptoms of depression, regardless of the primary diagnosis. This strategy was
tested on 5,149 inpatients and day patients over a period of 6.25 years and
compared with 6,891 patients over the 15.75 years prior to this period. The
suicide rate was 97 (per 100,000 admissions) compared with 319 in the previous
period. The treatment method appears to be able to reduce the suicide rate.
Although this result was achieved with hospital patients, it suggests that a
regressive treatment method could be promising if developed for outpatient
treatment as well.”
The
clinical record of the patient is really more than full of examples like this
one. On my German pages they are all published.
I lost my son due to bad treatment and wrong diagnoses, done by careless and dishonest doctors.
Many years ago I had already lost my daughter Marleen, Mario`s sister. Her mother was given a wrong injection during the birth of our first child.
When Marleen was born, she was mentally and physically completely disabled, due to a lack of oxygen during her birth. She had a terribly painful life and died at the age of eight.
It was also a very cruel death.
This
link opens a picture. There
you can see my father holding my disabled daughter and my first wife, the mother
of the two children who are both dead now.
This is an example of what was published on television in Germany in those days.
This is how I feel. What is left is the grave of my children and my memories!
Mario: 
Marleen,
shorty
before her death:
Court
proceedings
up to the highest German court, the
BGH, took about eight years, too. We won the
case and our daughter died four weeks
later.
In
those days we had the feeling that justice was very slow, but justice was still there.
Today we have the impression that justice is not there any more and that lobbyism
rules this country.
I published this story on the internet in the hope that people all over the world can see what is happening in Germany again. People supposedly under the protection of those institutions that should normally protect the public now protect each other and not the people who they are supposed to protect.
In this case the institutionalisation of my son into their care was the equivelant of giving him a death sentence.
Hopefully
a journalist from another country will see and realise the unjustice in this
tragic and cruel setup and will help to prevent this from being swept under the
carpet and forgotten.
The more you go into details, the more willful breaches of duty you will find.
This story has even been discussed in newspapers in Austria.
In Germany it is not even possible to publish a
payed small advertisement referring to my page on the Internet.
October 8th, found on the internet:
